From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Display/print text only for export Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 00:55:07 +0200 Message-ID: <874nrukzlg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120424215237.GA31235@okeanos> <87zk9sj813.fsf@gnu.org> <86obq2z2xr.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQnrj-0002bv-2B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:54:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQnrh-0002SM-CW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:54:14 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:47381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQnrh-0002Rp-3M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:54:13 -0400 Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so2170320wer.0 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:54:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86obq2z2xr.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Fran=E7ois?= Pinard"'s message of "Sat, 05 May 2012 18:19:12 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi François, François Pinard writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Does #+INCLUDE: suits your needs? > > Oh! I never used a colon after #+INCLUDE. Checking the Org manual, the > colon is systematically there, except within the last paragraph of node > /Updating files/. Maybe it could be added for consistency? Done, thanks. > I did not notice my error as everything worked without the colon. > Adding it everywhere in my files, things still works. Should Org be > more strict about this? I would have corrected myself earlier... The manual is as strict as possible now, but yes, there are places where the code is still liberal about this. If it is a problem in such places, thanks for taking the time to suggest a fix. Best, -- Bastien