From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Org, Org-mode, Orgmode, Org Mode Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:25:13 +0200 Message-ID: <874nqs7vzq.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <87fwaeyvxl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bol26q5u.fsf@googlemail.com> <87bol2yruc.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87obp2rpjv.fsf@gnu.org> <80k3zpiifq.fsf@somewhere.org> <4FCA79DE.4060606@gmail.com> <86d35hf58m.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb4DK-0004Fb-T1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 02:23:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb4DJ-0004bH-7m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 02:22:58 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb4DJ-0004bD-12 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 02:22:57 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb4DD-0007A8-QY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:22:51 +0200 Received: from g231224237.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.224.237]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:22:51 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by g231224237.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:22:51 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org François Pinard writes: > On the nomenclature issue of our preferred tool, if I had my say, I > would suggest Org, and drop "mode". Org is really a major Emacs mode, > in many acceptations of the word "major". We should speak of Org the > same way we speak of Calc or Gnus (or Dired). Org is nice, but: ,---------------------------- | (Google) | | org or "org" | About 8,760,000,000 results | | org-mode | About 49,800,000 results | (but Org-mode on top) | | org mode | About 55,200,000 results | (but Org-mode on top) | | "org-mode" or "org mode" | About 812,000 results `---------------------------- And isn't "org" often used as abbrev for "organisation" too? Otherwise, Org sounds really good as a 'brand name'. -- cheers, Thorsten