From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Agenda optimization: new option `org-agenda-inhibit-startup'
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:06:34 +0100
Message-ID: <874ni36llx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <871ud8dkby.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87libfukte.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50611)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TzOCE-0002Sl-5b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:06:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TzOCD-0003o8-1U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:06:38 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:41055)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TzOCC-0003nv-S5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:06:36 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm2so648703wib.10
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:06:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87libfukte.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Sun, 27
	Jan 2013 18:19:49 +1030")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> Seems to work fine and it does seem to speed things up significantly
> (although this is a non-quantitative assessment).

Thanks for confirming!

-- 
 Bastien