From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: iCalendar export problem Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:31:45 +0200 Message-ID: <874nfkwz8e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <515DF0B6.2010703@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOCMf-0001jj-T8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:32:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOCMZ-00022f-F8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:31:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:57814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOCMZ-00021X-8v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:31:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y10so4213552wgg.14 for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:31:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <515DF0B6.2010703@gmx.de> (Simon Thum's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:29:26 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Simon Thum Cc: emacs-orgmode Hello, Simon Thum writes: > However, that's not what DTSTAMP is for. Actually, it should be set to > the date-time the export happens. At least, that's what they say: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11594921/whats-the-difference-between-created-and-dtstamp-in-the-icalendar-format > > Changing that probably does not help my problem, but seems better than > the cooked-up values now ending up in DTSTAMP. I could not see any > other candidate problems, though the analysis is weak so far. Thank you for the report. I pushed a fix for the DTSTAMP value. Is it better now? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou