* iCalendar export problem
@ 2013-04-04 21:29 Simon Thum
2013-04-05 19:31 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Thum @ 2013-04-04 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode, Nicolas Goaziou
Hi all,
I have a strange problem that seems related to the iCalendar exporter.
I have an event which has the date spec
<2013-02-07 Th 12:00-14:00 +1w>
but shows up on 13:00 my phone calendar (fed by ox-icalendar), CEST. Fun
thing is, I did not experience lag with other entries.
The org entry becomes:
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20130207T110000Z
UID:TS1-d36d5eb9-e2db-42a3-866f-7442becadef0
DTSTART:20130207T120000
DTEND:20130207T140000
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1
SUMMARY:Brown Bag Meeting
DESCRIPTION:Location: R 103\n\nRecurs: <2013-02-07 Do 12:00
+1w>–<2013-02-07 Do 14:00 +1w> ...
Another one (shown right this time) is:
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20130404T150000Z
UID:TS1-441e317c-7b52-4910-bbd3-0949a5c1bdd7
DTSTART:20130404T170000
DTEND:20130404T190000
The difference seems to be the DTSTAMP which is "correctly" aligned with
DTSTART.
However, that's not what DTSTAMP is for. Actually, it should be set to
the date-time the export happens. At least, that's what they say:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11594921/whats-the-difference-between-created-and-dtstamp-in-the-icalendar-format
Changing that probably does not help my problem, but seems better than
the cooked-up values now ending up in DTSTAMP. I could not see any other
candidate problems, though the analysis is weak so far.
Cheers,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: iCalendar export problem
2013-04-04 21:29 iCalendar export problem Simon Thum
@ 2013-04-05 19:31 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-04-05 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Thum; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de> writes:
> However, that's not what DTSTAMP is for. Actually, it should be set to
> the date-time the export happens. At least, that's what they say:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11594921/whats-the-difference-between-created-and-dtstamp-in-the-icalendar-format
>
> Changing that probably does not help my problem, but seems better than
> the cooked-up values now ending up in DTSTAMP. I could not see any
> other candidate problems, though the analysis is weak so far.
Thank you for the report.
I pushed a fix for the DTSTAMP value. Is it better now?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-05 19:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-04 21:29 iCalendar export problem Simon Thum
2013-04-05 19:31 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).