From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: New exporter and dates in tables Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:02:56 +0200 Message-ID: <874nfa34vj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fvz1opiz.fsf@norang.ca> <8761zxwlvn.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9pntym.fsf@norang.ca> <0604BF00-1FE8-4EAA-A346-C125A5127CAD@gmail.com> <877gkcvm3n.fsf@gmail.com> <173ADFE7-A1FB-4ECB-A78A-C99662A8030F@gmail.com> <87fvyysghk.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9mh6ex.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2u1s3wf.fsf@gmail.com> <8738uxrrtc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwt2aefz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR12l-0002oT-5f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:03:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR12j-0007Rp-Po for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:03:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:33653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UR12j-0007RY-J6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:03:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so369409wiw.7 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 07:03:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mwt2aefz.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:54:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Is that OK with you? I still resist this idea. I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices: 'inactive-not-standalone 'active-not-standalone 'not-standalone When set to 'not-standalone, it means export time-stamps except "standone time-stamps", i.e. those who are alone on a line. That's the set-up most users will want after t, it fits the habits that Bernt has been describing, and it's useful for users who wants to get rid of the planning-like active time-stamp right below the headline. Also, it's easier to explain users how to set this up (through the docstring) than to explain why time-stamps are not removed in tables with (setq org-export-with-timestamps nil). -- Bastien