From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-exp-bibtex missing in git? Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:58:32 +0200 Message-ID: <874nf43y1z.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130303070635.GA12112@panahar> <87fw0cg42y.fsf@allisson.co> <87vc98be83.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehfwwgdd.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzg2r05.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87ppzgusem.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzcfy2e.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87lia0s7wi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <876213lqfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqtjo6h6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87boavcpzc.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw075ivl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqthk7vj.fsf@gmail.com> <8762103oso.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hak8vv6r.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USmY1-0001pC-Hc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:58:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USmY0-0006iO-Bs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:58:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:45239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USmY0-0006iK-5t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:58:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so1659912wiv.2 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:58:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hak8vv6r.fsf@gmail.com> (Aaron Ecay's message of "Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:02:20 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Aaron Ecay Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Andreas Leha , Nicolas Goaziou Hi Aaron, Aaron Ecay writes: > I hope this is not bothersome ... it is not, heads up are always welcome. > but have you had a chance to look at these patches? No -- and we are close to the release now, so let's not introduce new syntax for this. We still need to discuss this after Org 8.0, as the functionality is indeed needed. Feel free to raise it again then! And thanks for those patches. -- Bastien