From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Narrowing vs indirect buffer Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 03:10:27 +0100 Message-ID: <874n4slsks.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <52E2E3D5.2030303@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6shk-00031H-Je for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:10:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6shb-00089D-JE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:10:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:60006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6shb-000897-6Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:10:31 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so3722550wgh.19 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:10:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52E2E3D5.2030303@gmail.com> (Alan L. Tyree's message of "Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:06:13 +1100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alan L Tyree Cc: Emacs Orgmode Alan L Tyree writes: > Is there any preference (so far as org is concerned)? Are there any > "gotchas" that I should note? Just a personal preference: I use narrowing because I don't like multiplying buffers. -- Bastien