Hello, Xavier Garrido writes: > Thanks for your answer. Maybe I will try your solution. Otherwise > I will run a "before-parse-hook" to change fn:XX to something unique > (by adding buffer name for example. We could do it by default. One problem is that INCLUDE keyword is a very simple feature. For example, if you include two files in a row and the first one ends with a footnote section, the other one will be included in that section and, therefore, not exported. So if we start to make it smart, we could be tempted to add too many other checks. Anyway, here's a patch for that. WDYT? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou