From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: numbered equations in html export Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:56:21 +0200 Message-ID: <874mz1qga2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87zjgucq06.fsf@gmail.com> <87oaxano52.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877g3xd82k.fsf@gmail.com> <878uodryvh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k37xb2in.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1zTZ-0003Pa-15 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:56:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1zTL-0004ZI-6D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:56:04 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:47995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1zTG-0004YV-VY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:55:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k37xb2in.fsf@gmail.com> (Nick Dokos's message of "Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:02:40 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nick Dokos Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Admittedly, this point is moot as long as captions are not visible on >> latex environments. I think this should be fixed instead. >> > > Not sure I understand correctly: are you saying that in the latex output > every numbered equation would then have a visible caption? No I'm not. I suggested to ignore latex export back-end since it has its own numbering mechanism. I'm saying that in HTML output, numbering LaTeX equations could be done through captions. It is also possible to not use captions but, instead, regular numbering with appropriate LaTeX environments or macros (e.g., \tag{x}). But then, export engine cannot possibly be aware of that, so relying on #+NAME to get an equation number is bound to fail. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou