From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:36:06 +0000 Message-ID: <874mshupm1.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4sTl-0007Kt-0V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 09:36:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4sTh-0001br-Qu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 09:36:28 -0500 Received: from mail-am1on0138.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.112.138]:25184 helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4sTh-0001b6-IW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 09:36:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: (briangpowell .'s message of "Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:21:52 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-mode mailing list On Friday, 26 Dec 2014 at 21:21, briangpowell . wrote: [...] > Word is in a different class of software, the 2 aren't comparable at all. Indeed. Nonsense article, in my opinion. Comparing apples and oranges. In any case, as my writing is very highly equation based, I think I'll stick to LaTeX... (using org, of course) -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-581-g0e52f0