From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Guerry Subject: Re: Why not push? Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 09:07:41 +0200 Message-ID: <874mke5i2q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87y4hq38po.fsf@free.fr> <87r3nife7g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMsno-0000d8-D5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:07:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMsni-0004ns-Q2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:07:52 -0400 Received: from so1.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.11]:53284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMsni-0004mT-Ii for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 03:07:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r3nife7g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:21:07 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-Mode mailing list , Marcin Borkowski Nicolas Goaziou writes: > It's a first step. It would be nice to get rid of `org-split-string' > altogether in the long run. We may make `org-split-string' an obsolete > alias for `split-string', and update code base accordingly. Agreed. I was unclear, I meant: why not using split-string instead of org-split-string. -- Bastien