From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: non-standard link errors
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:28:53 +0100
Message-ID: <874mctck6y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CABUh-77q2+ricaz48Lnc9Vd21Rnf5Ds-VnaKNqVRnjDBqLV6Sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vb5bdtl2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CABUh-76X0WCyhMeisy7hBnsJytFeQEqd2trkVaks6VRyyRdsgA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47925)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1aZwgl-00009o-A3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 03:26:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1aZwgk-0001bM-9u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 03:26:51 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:35300)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1aZwgk-0001bG-4G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 03:26:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CABUh-76X0WCyhMeisy7hBnsJytFeQEqd2trkVaks6VRyyRdsgA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Skip Collins's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:23:40 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Skip Collins <skip.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Skip Collins <skip.collins@gmail.com> writes:

> I added this line to the top of my org file:
> #+OPTIONS: broken-links:t
>
> But that eliminates both the link and its description from the export.
> Changing it from 't' to 'mark' puts a BROKEN LINK message in the
> output. I suggest adding a new option 'pass' that would simply pass
> "broken" links verbatim into the output.

Not that I'm against the idea, but wouldn't it be a poor way to properly
fix the issue, i.e., add new link types?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou