From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Lawrence Subject: Re: How to change agenda sorting order temporarily? Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 08:25:50 -0700 Message-ID: <874m9fy3cx.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7P3f-0005O3-TE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 11:24:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7P3a-0006f8-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 11:24:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]:35953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7P3a-0006ep-JM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2016 11:24:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f144so52828752pfa.3 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 08:24:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Martin Beck , emacs orgmode-mailinglist Hi Martin, Martin Beck writes: > I'm working with a lot of pre-defined agendas, but I sometimes would > like to change the sorting order of one of those to different criteria > (by time, alphanumerically, etc.). > I did not find a way to do that in org-mode directly - did I overlook > something, or do I really have to change the configuration of the > whole agenda and rebuild it? Did you find the variable `org-agenda-sorting-strategy'? That offers a lot of possibilities. > Related problem: > If I change the configuration of the agenda by changing the > customizing options, those changes do only have an effect, if I kill > the agenda buffer and launch the agenda again. > It would be nice, if I just could rebuild the existing agenda with "r" > or "g", but that does not seem to be sufficient? I'm afraid I don't know the answer to this, but would also be interested to hear what it is. Best, Richard