From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Versioning of worg content Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 07:10:59 +0200 Message-ID: <874luu0ypt.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <20170106201728.GB24577@seven> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44201) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRvj1-0001Zt-7T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 03:24:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRvj0-0007WA-B3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 03:24:51 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "Stefan-W. Hahn" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Stefan, "Stefan-W. Hahn" writes: > is their a defined proceeding of how to cope with incompatible changes of > org-mode in the examples at orgmode.org/worg? No. Worg needs love. And yes, we could tag Worg's repository with Org-mode versions, the same as we would do with documentation. -- Bastien