From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] Agenda speed up Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:46:56 +0200 Message-ID: <874lrhimbz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87h8wtugst.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k20ecst9.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz2vu-0001us-6p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 11:47:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz2vq-0006mr-W4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 11:47:02 -0400 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:57436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz2vq-0006hP-Pm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 11:46:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Sun, 1 Oct 2017 17:39:22 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: Org Mode List Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > ... and i am getting a fixed error from before ... Do you mean you get an error which was fixed earlier? What error? > ... but 9maint and 9master produce agenda in about 3s ... > > ... while wip produces agenda in 26.75s ... This is obviously a bug. I would need a complete ELP report to fix it. > for my 2d agenda. elp as instructed shows no significant differences > > org-agenda-prepare-buffers 1 > 1.221983848 1.221983848 > org-agenda-files 3 > 0.00037503 0.00012501 This is not a complete ELP report. Use M-x elp-instrument-package RET org RET use the 26.75s command then display the report with M-x elp-results > also there are sorting differences in time grid for same minute and > for scheduled for same day. which i don't care about. I think I fixed sorting order. > also an inactive timestamp shows the headline above the headline that > contains it. this is a bug but cannot mce. I couldn't reproduce it after some quick tests. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou