From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aICQCe/FJ1/oYgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:08:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 0HsiBe/FJ191agAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:08:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423D0940291 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2VW0-0003om-8f for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 04:08:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2VVc-0003oQ-NJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 04:07:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]:55702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2VVa-000292-N8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 04:07:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id 2so1755030pjx.5 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 01:07:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=tEJ8rV9S1Sx3da6+4eZ0NERIkXefEy0bQGND/qr4BVE=; b=Ua+bUivhxbozhu/wKFk9+0MhPqpyX7ggI/EW03kav/IAnkY72a+QXqjswUv810ozrM jy0PhGZRhPkMGe/1fBVzFcF9ZjmFdpPm2uDrL+jiqHMyql1Gu8Jt7TUTYEEk1OcbjAor LEJCd6HuSyIkC5K3uN+JUYqdVC9vaNYObkE5+bkYbdYSB0p4t9hj82ohnke0ZziQ41HG jDZ97g06/hptJh5iakeQQeHdokbu5c0bJGknvpyU+vUgkAhhlFyHdgzBApvaZjaXXaMb ZRmCEdVVTgArlafuQqf72LZnJ9nEUaAOlsb52UfNRhKMylMoOE/MUkbgb2ElVi1kcE05 t0jQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=tEJ8rV9S1Sx3da6+4eZ0NERIkXefEy0bQGND/qr4BVE=; b=uhc+i/6b+RogaB8IvqMVihmS3zhVepT++7wBnWstHBcRvIHpy4F4MFzPY+Zo+cVuj6 lkQ9tS/Mu9TzBztTCW+UImDfzmQN7u28hdGobB9VqMzLBIulecGcP3FckSRWo7qAebUX KfLSQFtdRnk3ylGx7EZAmsvEdjVoLb4lFlC7mUv1MvKqbtnfnGNkNkWHBZghwQNNPDZF NzBB3WL4ysvPaNvI51/peldFs7Vqv6mGPTGjKwTgvUAz+wwk6H/wgVrMZIQDk/QMF1QS q2Msaamlr4u8yP0t5PSivmA4yAXb0dEkMRLmZUgHDhKwfWsZtm4a3AQhlN6uB+s7OCQ+ gHOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338YyntdaopSAEzXcrx5NbfQPI8xzSw2ktCXHo0AEhXE1SKpdhW 2qApfzLwXIW1zUn4+hiRJEo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziSpgmrKDCqCes66JEm20gozK4ydaE5YlnkAq0UI+uE0+/2cvndFSpcnjBq/5xBC9oWzh40Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3d02:: with SMTP id h2mr754800pjc.15.1596442065173; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 01:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.91.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m19sm18723247pgd.21.2020.08.03.01.07.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 01:07:44 -0700 (PDT) From: TEC To: Colin Baxter Subject: Re: Website revamp? Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:53:36 +0800 References: <87zh95g2ns.fsf@gmail.com> <87mu3hduk1.fsf@gmail.com> <87wo2lyvid.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0yldpuj.fsf@gmail.com> <20200730172204.GB17223@volibear> <87ime4ev3s.fsf@gmail.com> <20200730190331.GD17223@volibear> <878seyhj38.fsf@gmail.com> <87bljs6hph.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1so2u2b.fsf@yandex.com> <875za05l7v.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0ygusan.fsf@yandex.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 In-reply-to: <87k0ygusan.fsf@yandex.com> Message-ID: <874kpk5f02.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d; envelope-from=tecosaur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x102d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ua+bUivh; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.59 X-TUID: nKTgUKc8MLQM Colin Baxter writes: > It seems to have the usual vertical monotone blocks, commonly > seen in mobile sites. These may be necessary for the small > screen but represent to me a retrograde development in web-site > design. Ah yes, the big banner on the index page. I think I can see your point of view --- the current index is far more informative. Ultimately though the decision to use a banner wasn't just triggered by mobile considerations, but a little re-think about the structure and purpose of the website. As I see it, the desirable purpose of the 'main' pages is roughly as follows: - index :: attention grabber - features :: capture interest, entice to try - releases :: see what's changed recently - install :: how to get started - documentation :: dig into the details - contribute :: encourage to give back to the project With those goals in mind, I see a large banner on the index declaring (effectively) that "org is great" as being in line with the above UX. > Of course, my criticism is unimportant since you are doing the > hard work - not me. Quite the contrary! If there's anything I want more of with this effort (appart from general help) it's criticism/feedback. As you've pointed out it's (effectively) just me working on this: so hearing other people's thoughts is emminently desirable. > Would it be possible to have two sites: one for display on a > desktop and another for mobile use? Perhaps not. Effectively, yes. You could have CSS as follows: #+BEGIN_SRC css @media(min-width:851px) { /* desktop style */ } @media(max-width:850px) { /* mobile style */ } #+END_SRC > Good luck. Thanks :) I hope this can receive Bastien/Carsten's blessing and be used for the main site sooner rather than later. All the best, Timothy.