From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Numeric Priorities Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:00:25 +0200 Message-ID: <873ax4s4za.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> <7fa8cbf49995c5cb1dbd0ff46f6cd81d@science.uva.nl> <87ps0rx65n.fsf_-_@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> <87odfsfmk2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZlg3-0007Nj-O2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:00:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZlg1-0007N3-Vc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:00:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZlg1-0007Mz-Qo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:00:33 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZlg1-0003vP-BN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:00:33 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m4so891255uge for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:00:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Dmitri Minaev's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:50:22 +0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Dmitri Minaev" writes: > On 9/24/07, Bastien wrote: >> And maybe you would prefer the default priority for your books (5) be >> the first reachable one ... (see previous discussion in this thread.) > > Reachable via C-up? (I assume you meant S-up?) > It is. But Nuutti offered to interpret the absent priority as the > default one, and I prefer to differentiate between the unrated entries > and the entries with a priority. With Org 5.09 and #+PRIORITIES: A C B you need to do press S-up S-down (or S-down S-up) to set the default priority -- or did I miss something? My suggestion [1] was that S-up/down first set the *default* priority, then increases/decreases the priority cookie. Anyway, it looks like this request depends too much of what *I* expect from priorities, so I won't dwell too much on this, it's not that important to me. Thanks, Notes: [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/3255/match=priority -- Bastien