From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul R Subject: Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:29:17 +0100 Message-ID: <873agmyg4y.fsf@gmail.com> References: <5171E67B-8472-409A-A0EE-7EA25D18D58B@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCyKz-00019H-LX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:29:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCyKx-00017X-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:29:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51006 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCyKx-00017D-Ha for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:29:23 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f13.google.com ([209.85.219.13]:34597) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCyKx-0002Gl-08 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:29:23 -0500 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4515673ewy.18 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:29:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5171E67B-8472-409A-A0EE-7EA25D18D58B@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:31:26 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten> If Paul agrees, and if he has signed the papers with the FSF, Carsten> we can integrate his code into Org-mode. I do agree and I do have assigned copyrights to the FSF, but from the technical point of view I would prefer to see plain anonymous footnotes as explained above. I might implement it myself in case everybody agrees on it but nobody has time for it. Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following usages : * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenp=C5=8D[fn:: Kenpo is the name of several martial arts]. It is primarily a striking art using punching, kicking, knee and elbow strikes and open-handed techniques such as knife-hands and ridge-hands. Grappling, locks, restraints, throws, and vital point strikes are taught in some styles. A karate practitioner is called a karateka. * Usage 2, keyword named footnotes Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenp=C5=8D[fn:kenpo]. It is primarily a striking art using punching, kicking, knee and elbow strikes and open-handed techniques such as knife-hands and ridge-hands. [fn:kenpo] Kenpo is the name of several martial arts Grappling, locks, restraints, throws, and vital point strikes are taught in some styles. A karate practitioner is called a karateka. --=20 Paul