From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Lundin Subject: Re: Re: Export as HTML Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:45:53 -0500 Message-ID: <873acvhxwe.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <87hc1bwfsq.fsf@mundaneum.com> <874oxbwedd.fsf@mundaneum.com> <871vsfgpom.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoIkD-0003mU-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:45:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoIk8-0003jy-UB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:45:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36588 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoIk8-0003jr-IG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:45:40 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:37465) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoIk8-0002lU-3G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:45:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:11:37 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban Carsten Dominik writes: > I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or > whatever other name we can find a consensus for. > > I think I would object to removing it alltogether, I cannot see the > benefit of doing that. > > On the other hand, I cannot really see ths issue here, because the > name in the templates could be changed as well, and I would suspect > that this is a common issue name clashes when using templates. Completely agreed. This is not an important problem. Anyone who chooses to use org-mode for publishing a web site should know a little bit about hacking css. And as Sebastian R. suggests, we should certainly *not* change org-export because of some random css template! Let me clarify that I am perfectly happy with the current behavior. And I have a vested interest in *not* having it changed, since I'm lazy and don't want to have to change my css file again. :) - Matt