From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: More convenient methods for creating appointments?
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:47:34 -0500
Message-ID: <873abvwjy1.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <87d4azmze2.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu> <m2ws97hby1.fsf@fastmail.fm>
	<871vrfmuq4.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ly5cY-000661-Kt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:46:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ly5cU-00064i-2M
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:46:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39397 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ly5cT-00064d-TB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:46:13 -0400
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:43022)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1Ly5cT-0002WO-HD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:46:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871vrfmuq4.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu> (Sven Bretfeld's message of "26
	Apr 2009 15:04:51 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sven Bretfeld <sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch>
Cc: emacs-org <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Sven,

"Sven Bretfeld" <sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch> writes:

> You are absolutely right. I've read about the way you type your dates,
> but I thought it was even more cumbersome, since I didn't recognize the
> power of its 'recognition algorithm' (?). I thought one had to enter the
> whole date-string (year-month-day-weekday etc.) and never tried it.
>
> I'm very happy with your suggestions. It's really convenient.

Glad I could be of help. Yes, the timestamp shortcuts are indeed very
nice. Once again, a great big thank you to Carsten for another hidden
wonder of org-mode!

Best,
Matt