From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: Re: Sending org-mode nodes Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: <873a4a8t5b.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87aayjaih8.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> <873a4a29ce.wl%maus.david@gmail.com> <87hbsqu86y.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> <87skca93a9.fsf@gmx.de> <874ooqty72.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NB8MN-0002In-FW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:51:47 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NB8MG-0002Fz-IK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:51:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34478 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NB8MF-0002Fn-VZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:51:40 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43801) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NB8MF-0006Ib-9o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:51:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874ooqty72.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> (lukasz stelmach's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:56:49 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: lukasz.stelmach@iem.pw.edu.pl Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org lukasz.stelmach@iem.pw.edu.pl writes: > Sebastian Rose writes: >> lukasz.stelmach@iem.pw.edu.pl writes: >>> David Maus writes: >> //....// >>> - Message-ID derived from node's ID. This would be quite useful for >>> associating replies with original notes/nodes. >> >> >> In that case, each mail sent from the subtree would have the same >> message-ID, which is invalid, since the ID is made to identify a certain >> email. It's supposed to be world wide unique for at least two years. >> >> Your provider would replace your (probably invalid) ID anyway. > > I've written *derived* which means > org--- also fits. Right? Not sure. I only remember bad things with self generated message-IDs. But I never tried it myself. Reading the RFCs will help. [...] >> I believe it's not implemented, because it's easy to just >> >> C-c @ >> C-x m >> Enter addresses (bbdb helps a lot here) >> DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN >> C-y >> evtl. edit the contents >> C-c C-C > > Which only proves that it is possible to do it automatically. Yes, sorry, I don't want to stop anyone from doing it :) >> There's simply no need to implement it for Gnus users. >> Emacs+Org+bbdb+Gnus implement it already. > > How about attachments? How, at least, to get their full paths into kill > ring? Wether we like it or *not* some things can't be done in pure > text/plain. > > Putting a headline as a subject (with or without tags) makes it even > better as well as stripping any drawers (leading stars?). From the very > beginning I assumed there is a way of doing what I need just right now > but I described some enhancements that make work even less > troublesome. Imagine: > > C-c C-x m (org-send-node e.g.) > C-c C-c > > would be possible for a well prepared node (bbdb link stored as a > property). What makes nodesending even more appealing to me is that I > can have my emails (at least some of them) well organized with org (and > git) and attached to other things I do. Well, if you often resend a node, it makes absolutely sense, I guess. I always write my mails from scratch. But, on the other hand, I could imagine an Org-file with email templates like that. E.g. for mailing to certain groups of people. Best wishes Sebastian