From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [ANN] Changes to lists
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:15:03 +0100
Message-ID: <8739nxqatk.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
References: <87k4hve0y7.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87sjwe18cm.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<877hdqkro8.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87wrlme543.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<87fws1qfxx.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87d3n13vn7.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52276 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnFVQ-00064w-5B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:15:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1PnFVO-0004Ad-FL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:15:11 -0500
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:54123)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1PnFVO-0004AR-7a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:15:10 -0500
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so552126wyj.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:15:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87d3n13vn7.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

>>>>> Achim Gratz writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>> I've pushed a change in that direction. Unchecked boxes do not rely
>> anymore on visibility:hidden style property.

> Looks OK, but the space should probably be replaced by &nbsp; to
> avoid possible tearing of the checkbox. The regex for matching does
> not catch "[-]", which explains why this type of checkbox is not
> boldened. I think something like

Checkboxes are not boldened anymore since that patch. They are
enclosed in <code> tags. You may be, somehow, looking at old code.

Regards,

--
Nicolas