From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Subject: Re: advice: how to export a list without exporting all entries Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:29:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8739mdn3tm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ipvcvnoo.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55918 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2Rrv-0002jL-Up for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:29:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Rru-0000ip-7y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:29:15 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:33091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Rrt-0000ij-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:29:14 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so7931647bwz.0 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:29:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ipvcvnoo.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:16:07 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > I would like to move to a system in which all the actions are numbered > sequentially. At present, they are numbered sequentially within a list > for each meeting. I would like to have a single list which grows over > time. However, when I distribute the minutes of the latest meeting, I > would like to only have those actions which are not yet complete listed > in the document I circulate. The complication is that I want those > actions that have actually been done still in the list but not exported. > > Is there any way to /comment/ out individual list items (whether bullet > or enumerated) on export? I export typically to latex but this need not > be a constraint. Simply putting [ ] versus [X] boxes on the items is not > satisfactory as the list would be very long if all items were included in > the export. > > Is there some hook that I can intercept that would enable this? Can I > encapsulate individual list items into latex macros with the status of > the [ ] or [X] boxes? I am more than happy to write latex code as > required! Or even, at a push, elisp code... I'm not sure to fully understand what you want, but couldn't you delete-matching-lines toggled check-boxes in a copy of the original buffer, and export that? Regards, -- Nicolas