From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] Trouble with :cache yes
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:46:12 -0600
Message-ID: <8739mdenmj.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <C9AF8195.285AC%ken.williams@thomsonreuters.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40305 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2S8b-0005Hy-Ky
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:46:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Q2S8W-0004qr-D4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:46:25 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:65466)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Q2S8W-0004qn-6B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:46:24 -0400
Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so11510584iwl.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C9AF8195.285AC%ken.williams@thomsonreuters.com> (Ken Williams's
	message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:00:19 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ken.Williams@thomsonreuters.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, r.m.krug@gmail.com

<Ken.Williams@thomsonreuters.com> writes:

> On 3/23/11 1:46 AM, "Rainer M Krug" <r.m.krug@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>When exporting to a pdf, I get the following matrix in the pdf:
>>
>>          [,1]        [,2]     [,3]      [,4]
>>[1,] 0.5626863 0.8397120 0.9886886 0.2233873
>>[2,] 0.8697064 0.1101432 0.1372992 0.4114674
>>[3,] 0.3548678 0.5658843 0.1608864 0.5809167
>>
>>And it is different after each export. So it seems that the code block
>>*is* actually evaluated, despite of the cached info.
>>
>>Rainer
>
>
> Yes, that's exactly the behavior I'm seeing too.  Caching seems to have no
> effect on HTML export, no matter whether the block already has a
> "#+results" section or not.
>

Please try once more after updating Org-mode, I just pushed up a fix
which should resolve this problem.

Thanks -- Eric

>
>  -Ken