From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: new exporter Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:11:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87394r76no.fsf@gmail.com> References: <3C38420E-E2FA-4CAB-B3FD-9C5F8584E60A@gmail.com> <87396dzlai.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> <871ulqgb4t.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5nyx4ku.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87a9zq7htj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4t261fw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3yu15wj.fsf@gmail.com> <87395hkj7u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fw9gwmet.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87pq8j2a0y.fsf@gmail.com> <87r4sy3rve.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fw9d1eif.fsf@gmail.com> <878veo6d1a.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87d340u077.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipdrpl5n.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87liimfh5l.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9z1kz9r.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87vcho7qi3.fsf@gmail.com> <87394ssrr5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4sc6qld.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5mjo9ti.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqsd6-0006u1-DC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:14:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqsd5-0001Nv-4R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:14:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:36123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqsd4-0001Nq-Ts for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:14:55 -0400 Received: by wgbez12 with SMTP id ez12so3896409wgb.30 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5mjo9ti.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:11:21 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Achim Gratz writes: > Actually, it wasn't. These two lines would be the only additions you > need AFAICS and you could even make them on the command line: > > BTEST_EXTRA = org-export BTEST_OB_LANGUAGES = Good to know, thank you. > I still don't get that error and all tests are pass, with Emacs24 from > Bzr. I do get an error from Emacs 23.3 (Lisp nesting exceeds > `max-lisp-eval-depth'), but that can be circumvented by increasing the > limit via > > BTEST_PRE="--eval '(setq max-lisp-eval-depth 18000)'" > > I then get two fails with really lengthy backtraces of what look to be > nested macro expansions > > 2 unexpected results: > FAILED test-org-element/parent-property > FAILED test-org-element/set-element I cannot get those. Have you tried with a recent Org (i.e. post 95cd07d058da79cb1767946dba6e4b9128a3a702)? > ...but still not the error you've been reporting. I also cannot anymore. I suppose I had fumbled with hard links (i.e. forgetting to remove the previous one). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou