From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: auto-fill non-op, fill-paragraph error Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:54:19 +0200 Message-ID: <873922uub8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87lig82jod.fsf@demeulle.org> <87a9wnaapw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878vc7ifsb.fsf@demeulle.org> <87haqno75v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vcf3l9cu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a9wektfg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r4pouuly.fsf@demeulle.org> <87vcez6et8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r4pna6vc.fsf@demeulle.org> <87lifvmsru.fsf@demeulle.org> <87ipaz6tz8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87obkqdd9z.fsf@demeulle.org> <878vbur6t5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3veclxf.fsf@demeulle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47755) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THb1H-0006z6-N2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:54:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THb1D-0001nA-JY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:54:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:51663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THb1D-0001n4-Ct for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:54:15 -0400 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so4079191wib.12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:54:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3veclxf.fsf@demeulle.org> (Edward DeMeulle's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:32:44 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Edward DeMeulle Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Edward, Edward DeMeulle writes: > org-element-parse-buffer is a Lisp function in `org-element.el'. > > org-fill-paragraph is an interactive compiled Lisp function in > `org.el'. Sorry, I should have mentioned that I interested in the absolute path org-element.el and org.el here. Could you send this? But it's already good that the first function is defined. -- Bastien