From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: problem with org-element-parse-buffer Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:04:57 +0800 Message-ID: <8738zxrx6u.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87haovrwcs.fsf@micropit.couberia.selfip.net> <87y5i76qfv.fsf@gmail.com> <877gpbrz1g.fsf@micropit.couberia.selfip.net> <87ehjjkx8n.fsf@gmail.com> <87lidqwbix.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a9u63v3e.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcn4J-0004F4-PO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:01:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcn4I-0003pZ-KG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:01:03 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcn4I-0003pR-EN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:01:02 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcn4R-0001hw-QY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:01:11 +0100 Received: from 114.250.111.164 ([114.250.111.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:01:11 +0100 Received: from eric by 114.250.111.164 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:01:11 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >>> Strictly speaking, yes. But Org Agenda is a bit permissive (and not only >>> for that thing). Do you want to help basing Agenda on Elements? [...] >> This is something I've wanted for a while, as it would make >> some of my little personal projects a lot easier. I'd be happy to help >> if there's a roadmap, and if I can be fed bite-sized problems to deal >> with. > > There's no roadmap for now. If you're looking for small tasks to handle, > I think interactive functions are a good start (although some can be > a bit challenging, i.e. `org-open-link'). Particularly good candidates > are those calling either `org-at-regexp-p', `org-in-regexp' or > `org-between-regexps-p': using those is almost always wrong (or at least > fragile). > > If you give a shot at some of them, please include ert tests: writings > tests for Org is really a must from now on. There are now plenty of > examples in testing directory. Great, thanks for the pointers. I'll see if I can't provide a few patches in the next couple of weeks. E