From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: Re: org-exp-bibtex missing in git?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:44:56 +0100
Message-ID: <8738w7egzb.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <20130303070635.GA12112@panahar> <87fw0cg42y.fsf@allisson.co>
	<87vc98be83.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehfwwgdd.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ppzg2r05.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87ppzgusem.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ppzcfy2e.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87lia0s7wi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87obewe5jy.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwugqgt9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87ip54drrn.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <871ubrr4ou.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54265)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UDWYo-0002dS-8y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:52:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UDWYm-0005mD-OM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:52:22 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35909)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UDWRu-0003lb-TM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:45:15 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UDWSC-00066j-Ku
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:45:32 +0100
Received: from genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.140.110])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:45:32 +0100
Received: from andreas.leha by genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de with
	local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:45:32 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Bastien,


Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>
>> But it looks very verbose to me.  I expect the introduction to a
>> scientific paper (with typically many \cite{}s) to look disrupted.
>
> Each \cite{...} would be nothing more than
> [[cite:A.N.Whitehead][A.N.Whitehead]] in the Org file.
>

In this case, you can ignore my comment on verbosity.

> The config happens in the #+LINK: cite ... line.
>
> I also think the proposal makes it easy to use several
> bibliographic files, with several #+LINK: citeN ... lines.
>
> In general, the idea is just to be able to hook an export
> function to a link after it has been expanded, and maybe 
> this can be useful beyond this use-case.  For example:
>
>   #+LINK: local file://%s org-odt-local-link
>   #+LINK: local file://%s org-odt-global-link
>
> The first line would be used for documents that you want
> to use locally, creating links to your files on your machine.
> The second line would be used for documents that want to 
> share with others.

Now, that there is a proposal supporting additional citation command,
and pre-, post-notes 
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/67818) I would
definitely love to see that supported.
So my question is: are your proposals mergable?  Or are they orthogonal?

Regards,
Andreas