From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] Drop `:results code'?
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:20:58 -0600
Message-ID: <8738uve5kg.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <86obdmavt1.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41395)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UQmeD-0001Rs-9W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:40:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UQmeB-00087O-Oy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:40:45 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:41340)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UQmeB-000878-Fx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:40:43 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id bj3so1686769pad.34
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Shouldn't we, for the sake of simplifying the multiple options, drop the
> support for `:results code'?
>
> It is completely redundant (though, less powerful) with `:wrap'.
>

I have no problem with that.

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte