From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Unable to push to org-mobile Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:20:07 -0500 Message-ID: <8738ki1ejs.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <13008CFE-91B9-4221-9DBB-96157A4A2FC6@gmail.com> <87mwk3us82.fsf@gmail.com> <87iouruoq2.fsf@gmail.com> <7C5E5469-0D18-4387-8FD7-D3005F06FCCE@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5NCo-0003XG-0K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:20:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5NCg-0000u9-J2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:20:29 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5NCg-0000ts-Cd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:20:22 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5NCd-0005iP-V8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:20:19 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:20:19 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:20:19 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dror Atariah writes: > I'm sorry I keep bugging with this... ;) > > On Dec 14, 2013, at 22:06 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Nick Dokos writes: >> >>> Dror Atariah writes: >>> >>>> 2. What's next? I believe this is a bug... How can I report it? >>> >>> Consider it reported - thanks for checking it. I'll push the proposed fix later >>> on today. If it is wrong, we can revert it later, but at least for now >>> it seems to fix the bug. >>> >> >> I pushed the patch. > > I believe that the patch is wrong. The line "((eq (car x) :grouptags) > nil)" is currently (as per the version of ELPA) #463, but it yields > the same error as the one I reported initially. I moved it to line > #464 (right after the one with ":newline") and it solved the issue. > > 1. Does it make sense? No. I'd go back to a clean slate and try again: chances are you had something left over (perhaps org-mobile.elc?) that's curdling thing. The lines in question are --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (setq def-tags (mapcar (lambda (x) (cond ((null x) nil) ((stringp x) x) ((eq (car x) :startgroup) "{") ((eq (car x) :endgroup) "}") ((eq (car x) :grouptags) nil) ((eq (car x) :newline) nil) ((listp x) (car x)))) def-tags)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It makes absolutely no difference whether the :grouptags line comes before or after the :newline line: they are mutually exclusive. In any case, where is the backtrace? Nick