From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: #+OPTIONS: line kept in 'body-only' export to Org Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:40:20 +0200 Message-ID: <8738d7nzm3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87vbq47wuq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFfiF-0007pA-Nq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 04:39:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFfi5-0006UC-JK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 04:39:47 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:60784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFfi5-0006Tz-Cq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 04:39:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87vbq47wuq.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:34:21 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > doing: > > ,---- > | 1. C-c C-e > | 2. C-b ; body-only > | 3. O O ; -> Org buffer > `---- > > on this Org-buffer > > > ,---- > | #+TITLE: Foo > | #+DATE: <1953-05-15 Fr> > | #+OPTIONS: toc:nil p:t author:nil pri:t prop:t tags:nil > | > | * A > | > | ** TODO B > | :PROPERTIES: > | :task_id: xyz > | :END: > `---- > > I get > > ,---- > | #+OPTIONS: toc:nil p:t author:nil pri:t prop:t tags:nil > | > | * A > | > | ** TODO B > | :PROPERTIES: > | :task_id: xyz > | :END: > `---- > > Is that expected behaviour? > > For me thats a bit surprising, since it would still force me to > post-process the results to really extract only the body of the Org > buffer. "Body" of the Org buffer is a bit fuzzy as OPTIONS could be anywhere, including at the end of the buffer. Anyway, I moved it into template, so it shouldn't appear anywore when exporting body-only. Thank your for suggesting this. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou