From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [patch] extend org-meta-return to keywords Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:54:24 +0100 Message-ID: <873899503j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87egszw8ui.fsf@gmx.us> <87wq6o3u57.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvdb4l6c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sihb4ede.fsf@pank.eu> <87lhn36nq1.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnny4ybq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <5471C038.4080102@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsaPv-0002kw-9m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:53:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsaPl-0004UL-0p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:53:43 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:45944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsaPk-0004U4-RW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:53:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5471C038.4080102@free.fr> (Thierry Banel's message of "Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:08:40 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thierry Banel Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Thierry Banel writes: > I'm not sure I understand the /structure/ argument. (Is structure > about hiding blocks? Parsing org docs?). > > Nicolas, you have worked a lot on this topic (org-element, new drawer >syntax). May be you could elaborate on this. M-RET, C-RET are the major mean to insert headlines (the structure of the document) and items, which are very important features. I'm pretty sure these bindings are in muscle memory of many Org users. Asking them to take into account context before using M-RET is a big downside. I think, on the contrary, that it should do its job without exception. > We already have M-RET for splitting a table cell > (org-table-wrap-region). Should this feature be remapped to some other > key-binding? Binding `org-table-wrap-region' to an important keybinding such as M-RET is wrong IMO. Anyway, that's not the subject here, which is to avoid adding more clutter to M-RET. Let's not make it another C-c C-c. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou