From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: 63 failures for org-test-run-all-tests in an Emacs GUI Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:17:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87387jey7m.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <86zjaf7knu.fsf@example.com> <87ioh12x25.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86bnmk892t.fsf@example.com> <87wq546sjd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86a91rbrde.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9t6B-0006X4-HH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:16:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9t68-0005T5-Az for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:16:51 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:48669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9t68-0005SE-4m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:16:48 -0500 Received: from mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.166]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE36FB886 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:16:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]) by mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tn5UD+W-BS9G for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:16:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from selenimh (unknown [91.224.148.150]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86696FB877 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:16:45 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <86a91rbrde.fsf@example.com> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:01:33 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode List Sebastien Vauban writes: > Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Sebastien Vauban writes: >> >>> Did I misunderstand the change of last year (Dec '13) or should `sh' >>> language be abandoned in favor of `shell'? >> >> I think you're right. >> >>> IIUC, then, those blocks should be updated: ... >>> And those inline calls as well: ... >>> I am willing to make the patch. >> >> Great. Please do. > > Here it is. Thanks. Unfortunately, I'm still unable to apply your patch. Before using "git format-patch", please ensure that your patch is the only one on top of HEAD, and send it again. If you already did, maybe someone else with write access to the repo will be able to sort it out. Regards,