From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:00:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87385za2z7.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87pp94t0sq.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YP8jw-0002mL-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:00:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YP8js-0005bE-JC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:00:56 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YP8js-0005b8-Bv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:00:52 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YP8jq-0001t5-9A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:00:50 +0100 Received: from 46.166.186.238 ([46.166.186.238]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:00:50 +0100 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.186.238 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:00:50 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Lawrence writes: > You're right that consistency in that syntax would be a good thing. > Moreover, Org already has syntax that looks a lot like plists in > #+ATTR_BACKEND lines and in Babel source block headers, so it seems > natural to adopt something like it for other sorts of objects. Org also already has [fn:·:·] that already is supported inline and looks an awful lot like [cite:·:·]. . . —Rasmus -- Hooray!