From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Guerry Subject: Re: [DEV] Bump Emacs requirement to 24.4? Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:22:17 +0200 Message-ID: <8737zxs7dy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87io8tfrtk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZN74u-0006Fm-U3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:22:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZN74p-00051Y-Lo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:22:28 -0400 Received: from so1.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.11]:34277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZN74p-0004zW-96 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:22:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87io8tfrtk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 05 Aug 2015 21:39:19 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode List Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Just to be sure, can we require Emacs 24.4 for development version > (a.k.a. Org 8.4)? As a data point, Debian stable provides it. Before discussion 24.4 vs say 24.3... why? What compatibility code is a burden today? > Also, what is the status of XEmacs support? AFAIU Org 8.3 doesn't build > on XEmacs but no one is complaining. We may as well drop it and ignore > most of "org-compat.el". I'm all for dropping XEmacs support. -- Bastien