From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jorge.alfaro-murillo@yale.edu (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) Subject: Re: Not getting replies from the orgmode list to my e-mail address Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:25:57 -0400 Message-ID: <8737z6nn2i.fsf@yale.edu> References: <87egiqjmd9.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUbei-0001a9-Na for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:26:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUbeg-0001m0-2u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:26:24 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUbef-0001ls-Sq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:26:22 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUbed-0005RE-Qs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:26:20 +0200 Received: from 130.132.236.141 ([130.132.236.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:26:19 +0200 Received: from jorge.alfaro-murillo by 130.132.236.141 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:26:19 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > On Wednesday, 26 Aug 2015 at 14:07, Meir Goldenberg wrote: >> Sorry for being off the main topic. For some reason, I do not >> get replies to the GMail address from which I send my posts to >> the orgmode list. > > I am confused. Are you subscribed to the mailing list? If not, > you may only receive replies when people have explicitly put > your email address in the response. Replies need not be written > to go to both you and the list. I would add: and should not. Otherwise people subscribed to the list get the message twice. -- Jorge.