From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: function for inserting a block Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:07:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87375ouanr.fsf@gmx.us> References: <877exghblx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2uoc4q7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bmllk5xy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878tgmwwsa.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po9q2e8k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvyyvpst.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuaiz069.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgk9eo4d.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuahxxvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2u1cuwj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87infdctzq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zsbizs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zp4rxj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871slx4j6p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87376btslq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vaj7oyxb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871sl9ow44.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu9pgfkj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCR0r-0006g5-EH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 09:07:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCR0n-0005WY-4N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 09:07:29 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=53388 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCR0m-0005W0-T0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 09:07:25 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCR0V-0008UO-9E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:07:07 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Thanks you, Eric, for providing this new functionality. Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Maybe I missed something in this thread, but what about making >> the change backward-compatible by allowing "> be expanded? For me, I'd rather type > I suggested the idea to remove " many other template systems, e.g., YASnippet, already provides this. > I didn't want to re-implement the wheel and let, instead, various parts > of Emacs cooperate. I am only reading the thread now; my apology for coming late to the "party". I think the template expansion a la "