From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Patch adding from-logo commentary ox-koma-letter.el
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:37:00 +0200
Message-ID: <8736xgeb0j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAAjq1mdUSWsNQWMjUii=Tt6s6zcRg=fwdAP5vHmHEuUZgq0kbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<8736xji4a8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAAjq1mexaQ1okERDYyPm6nTO28LBpuS_3TOXyMcurUvD7d8KvA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40584)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1fVw2S-0006Kl-BA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 05:38:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1fVw2R-0007cs-EH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 05:38:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAAjq1mexaQ1okERDYyPm6nTO28LBpuS_3TOXyMcurUvD7d8KvA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Grant Rettke's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:38:57 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com> writes:

> When I wrote this, I felt like because ox-koma-letter makes it so easy
> for non LaTeX Org users, that a reminder would help because this
> variable is I think the only one that requires any LaTeX knowledge.
>
> That was the context for my statement. I'm making a big assumption
> that non latex org users would benefit here.

The problem is that your assumption makes the wording inaccurate.
I think it would be better to expound this a bit, maybe with a couple of
examples, or by using meta syntactic variables:

  \includegraphics{path/to/logo}

> If you like the additional documentation, then I will update it with
> this and send a new patch.

Let's first merge the complete documentation, then apply it, if you
don't mind.

Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou