From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nuutti Kotivuori Subject: Re: GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:35:43 +0300 Message-ID: <871wcmsl5c.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> References: <87myva7vqb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <68b42f8090c0f835ab651ae9ae35f181@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEKP-0006HU-CG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:36:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEKN-0006H3-Jn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:36:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEKN-0006Gy-CO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:36:07 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IaEKM-0004Fs-R6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:36:07 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEK4-0007S7-Q6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:35:48 +0000 Received: from naked.iki.fi ([62.142.249.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:35:48 +0000 Received: from naked by naked.iki.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:35:48 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik wrote: > Again, I have never seen this. hmmm, we had a thread recently where > someone was complain that the comments were not removed. Does > anyone remember was the reason was? Simply that the remember handler was not the org-mode handler, instead the data was filed with the default remember behaviour, althought the template came from org-mode. -- Naked