From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: timer for a task Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:16 -0400 Message-ID: <871vqaisdb.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <61176df0905250140l1e9a4d7cjfa1de41011b358a9@mail.gmail.com> <87k545h6v4.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net> <61176df0905250330k4a21837bv755defde84297f69@mail.gmail.com> <938fae2d0905250344i71979176yc7f0b6e47380ce6f@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0905250843n3da682c2xc46280c7b6c24670@mail.gmail.com> <3B729AF0-A30A-4EED-B87F-000F5ED0BFA9@gmail.com> <61176df0905260726g7397a370pdc30fb0b3cd067bb@mail.gmail.com> <61176df0905261513y14e397b0h8610b1fb4f2489cb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9JF4-00005k-CJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9JF0-0008VA-K2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32941 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9JF0-0008Ux-9u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:22 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:56107) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9JEz-0007Rx-Ro for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed\, 27 May 2009 06\:27\:15 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode mailing list Carsten Dominik writes: > On May 27, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Konstantin Antipin wrote: > >> Just a suggestion: why don't we use github for org-mode hosting? It >> would be soooo simple to contribute >> and to manage things! You would only benefit from this, Carsten.;) >> Github is a really nice service. And free, of course. > > What would be the advantages of using github instead of repo.or.cz? > I have found repo.or.cz less polished looking than githib, but very > fast and reliable, while github is getting boged down when America > wakes up :-) I don't think there is any advantage to moving to github since you already have a hosted working git repo. If Konstantin wants to share his patches all he has to do is make them available somewhere on the net so you can pull from his git repo. He can use github or whatever server is convenient for him without requiring you to change your workflow (unless you want to of course :) ) -Bernt