From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Subject: Re: Integrating ctags & org mode (patch) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:06:15 +0100 Message-ID: <871vivq4dk.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <2AC5C31A-0ABA-4163-9F4F-9F0D26A6F538@gmail.com> <11402.1260912797@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKfXl-00018t-1E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:06:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKfXg-00017d-60 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:06:56 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44642 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKfXg-00017X-0v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:06:52 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49317) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKfXf-0006Jo-NG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:06:52 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NKfXb-0004m6-LV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:06:47 +0100 Received: from 64.red-83-34-21.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.34.21.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:06:47 +0100 Received: from ofv by 64.red-83-34-21.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:06:47 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Can these patches be applied using the standard patch(1) command? > I tried and I get > > $ patch < ~/Mail/inbox/1265 > patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input. You have to replace `{' with `>' and `}' with `<' in the patch before applying it. > If they cannot be applied that way, can you please provide them in a > more standard format? Unified diff format is probably the best: > > diff -u file.orig file.modified The problem the OP has is with the web form he uses for sending the messages. -- Óscar