From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:46:35 -0700 Message-ID: <871v47xvjo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrs3hge.fsf@gmail.com> <871v48s3xu.fsf@fastmail.fm> <10576.1295493005@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87mxmvy43m.fsf@fastmail.fm> <15074.1295540204@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56047 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfzWv-0004yw-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:46:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfzWt-0004ZD-R9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:46:45 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:37179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfzWt-0004YY-Og for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:46:43 -0500 Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so884381qwa.0 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:46:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Jeff Horn's message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:09:11 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jeff Horn Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Bastien , Matt Lundin , Jason Dunsmore , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Jeff Horn writes: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: >> Matt Lundin wrote: >> >>> Nick Dokos writes: >>> >>> > Matt Lundin wrote: >>> > >>> >> So the new, "flat" FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are >>> >> welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements. >>> >> >>> > >>> > Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unreadable - >>> > at least to my eyes. >>> >>> I agree. I reverted the black background. >>> >>> If a dark background is preferred, we'll need to make sure that we >>> export an entire dark color theme (such as zenburn) with >>> org-export-htmlize-generate-css. >>> >>> As it stood, we were simply using a black background with colors >>> exported from a light theme (e.g, dark blue headlines). Needless to say, >>> this made the text unreadable. :) >>> >> >> Much better! > > Nick, > > This is what I see when I visit the FAQ page.[1] The TOC column seems > to be very narrow. I'm using Chrome with the "Next Worg" stylesheet. > I believe the "Next Worg" stylesheet is very old and not a product of the current round of CSS updates. Once the arternative stylesheets are updated to reflect this most recent development round I would imagine that the "Next Worg" stylesheet will disappear. > > Footnotes: > [1] http://cl.ly/47Cn