From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Danjou Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:09:04 +0100 Message-ID: <871v2td0xr.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1634804363==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59443 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PthJD-0001UA-FG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:09:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PthJC-0001jP-99 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:09:15 -0500 Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174]:49221 helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PthJB-0001jL-Vq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:09:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:43:59 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============1634804363== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 27 2011, Bastien wrote: > I am in favor of using a [DEV] tag and stick to one single list. This is not something automatic, so this is not something everyone will do. I won't think about it most of time and will forget, so=E2=80=A6 > The path from users to developers (and to core Org developers) is > a continuum, keeping this continuum on one list is a good thing. Your own vision of Org is probably that, so you'd subscribe to both list. I personally do not have enough time to care about users problems nor their features complaints for now, so spending time with developement subject only and not having to filter out usage related thread would make me gain an amount of time that I could spend on hacking Org. This is not something I'd propose on a low trafic list, but the number of mails here is getting bigger and bigger, and it's hard for me as a developer (and not as a maintainer like you) to just follow the stream of subject I am interested into (i.e. developement of Org). If some developers (like you) have more time to follow users subjects, nothing stop you to read both lists. At this point of trafic rate, not splitting is mostly killing people like me. :) =2D-=20 Julien Danjou =E2=9D=B1 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNalsAAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXClugQAJK6tbitflV9X4fUztGFj45E pGJKvlik5Wngve4sWkeUBp9ulRPGI15mqHfw5dOFaH3XE7ib101r/wXAzdrYQpMr z67CIcCWY4xgPzHd+AcOrdHpfGY6Ounh/zBOUD4tXvAMYxdLS7n44zXA2yWprn2N 2R8/WLoXuxHT1k5I3dbE6oXFeAhlu+UhPCl/tQLnUv5RbSc+UWFfVKm9zsobamwK SjRx5+ifeYpmXBjdpE3DgGnLZ55yEfiydSxNDbUsNfHlGBtNZ+sbaioKMAGRanuT PZS6p0jrdLDR0jFbinrIU2QDmmcMIVJkboZsgUq6vkoPV+ElcrwUtSoPDd7ln8tz vUaewgVNdtNaKW/6OGSRitXilgc9zaAYQvoikvvvEHREgda/wfQa4poX3Wq0g8um pzifGUUaKAPCvugx9IzS++s9AG9J1dslxRhiMA6hDrkRlibEJQpGgWvmc8st7RSC kUirrmVscjaAUpL3Kk4dKEYRes8LyA9VLXQTp8x+y3Hulapca/+3ThbOB0bUSQgx p7QqT5FsGYndDowPxfiYvEx9/lmiOb1mrVbrz9y1+sckNYS9zepp0L+k3NqHJYU+ /DACAgcIZffhi/KPwoCeNSQNB1g9W1R68hEv7KIAnOvyqDxkn4fEW1ZWcSiAeZYu M3T2eFbwNXo4tEzqGECb =Z4Qm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1634804363== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1634804363==--