From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [BUG] ORG-LIST-END-MARKER within table.el table Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:24:51 +0200 Message-ID: <871v0u2zbw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <81k4enebzd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDGLw-0001Mg-6e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:24:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDGLv-0004wj-BR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:24:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:48864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDGLv-0004wc-6v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:24:55 -0400 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so541878wyf.0 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:24:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81k4enebzd.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:13:50 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Jambunathan K writes: > Export the following fragment to html > > * Another Table.el Table with Spanning > > +----------+----------+ > | Header 1 | Header 2 | > +----------+----------+ > | R1 C1-2 | > +----------+----------+ > | R2 C1 | R2-3 C2 | > + +----------+ > | | | > +----------+----------+ > > > Examine the temporary buffer that is emitted by > `org-export-preprocess-string'. Note that there is a ORG-LIST-END-MARKER > within the table.el table. > > > * Another Table.el Table with Spanning > > +----------+----------+ > | Header 1 | Header 2 | > +----------+----------+ > | R1 C1-2 | > +----------+----------+ > | R2 C1 | R2-3 C2 | > + +----------+ > ORG-LIST-END-MARKER > +----------+----------+ This is because + +----------+ is recognized as a list item. But this case shouldn't happen. If you span "R2 C1" cell vertically, you get +----------+----------+ | Header 1 | Header 2 | +----------+----------+ | R1 C1-2 | +----------+----------+ | R2 C1 | R2-3 C2 | | +----------+ | | | +----------+----------+ instead, which is correct. Did you edit table by hand? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou