From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: Making the output of %% functions linkable in agenda views
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:47:59 -0400
Message-ID: <871v0ftssg.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <yucfwptbx83.fsf@lcms.org> <yucsjsvra96.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87aaf3tv5l.fsf@fastmail.fm> <yuc7ha7r1ng.fsf@lcms.org>
	<8762prtul0.fsf@fastmail.fm>
	<9132.1304454535@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44467)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1QHMVn-00031l-CI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:48:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1QHMVm-0002yn-DR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:48:03 -0400
Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:60459)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1QHMVm-0002yh-5S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:48:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <9132.1304454535@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> (Nick Dokos's
	message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 16:28:55 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: "Sebold, Charles" <Charles.Sebold@lcms.org>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> wrote:
>
>
>> I should clarify. I, too, can see the link in the agenda. I had been
>> under the impression that only diary sexps will appear in the agenda,
>> but it seems that a generic sexp that returns a string will also show
>> up.
>> 
>> I'm not sure whether this is a feature or a bug.
>> 
>
> I *think* it's a feature but I'm really not sure: the regexp is just
> "^&?%%(" so it does not seem to care what comes after it. Various things
> (like the sunrise/sunset hacks) use it, so if it is deemed to be a
> bug-to-be-fixed, they will break when it *is* fixed :-)

Thanks! Yes this indeed a feature. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't
sending a patch that enhanced a bug. :)

Best,
Matt