From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: org-mode documentation question
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:41:41 +0200
Message-ID: <871uyei6fu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106232347590.38595@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1106240013510.39126@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35134)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QbVjI-00084X-Rq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:41:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QbVjF-0005IZ-4L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:41:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:43174)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QbVjE-0005IN-AD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:41:12 -0400
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so69147wyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106240013510.39126@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
	(Jude DaShiell's message of "Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:28 -0400 (EDT)")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Jude,

Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net> writes:

> I just checked with make targets and the Makefile has no rule to show 
> available targets.  Such a rule would give builders a clue as to what 
> additional possibilities exist with the Makefile if it existed.

Can you provide a patch?

-- 
 Bastien