From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:00 +0200 Message-ID: <871uyd7zon.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8739ivw8e8.fsf@gnu.org> <2011-06-28T15-28-18@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2011-06-28T18-04-12@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87sjqt6f3i.fsf@gnu.org> <2011-06-28T20-40-40@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <874o39v9td.fsf@gnu.org> <24271.1309302652@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <87pqlxjyp9.fsf@gnu.org> <5383.1309311845@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <80sjqtdrl3.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbr5T-00016V-2h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:29:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbr5R-00076e-Kt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:29:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:33835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbr5R-00076X-6w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:29:33 -0400 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so830647wwf.30 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:29:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80sjqtdrl3.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:28:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Sebastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > See http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg37987.html where I > report such a case with inactive timestamps and SCHEDULED dates. > > See Bastien's answer in the same thread. In this case, SCHEDULED should come > first, before DEADLINE, for it to work. There are still strange things here, I want to address them before 7.6. Stay tuned. -- Bastien