From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:48:49 -0600 Message-ID: <871uu65j7i.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <30891.1319141196@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87fwinifqu.fsf@gmail.com> <32184.1319143892@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <808vofwf1w.fsf@somewhere.org> <87y5wfgwn7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87y5wemt4h.fsf@gmail.com> <87aa8u5mu7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHJDD-0007NK-SY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:48:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHJDC-000113-G1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:48:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:54579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHJDC-00010z-CZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:48:54 -0400 Received: by qadc11 with SMTP id c11so1573314qad.0 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:48:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87aa8u5mu7.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:27:44 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Sebastien Vauban , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org So far I have the following. code block names | source | dye | | srcname | dokos | | srcname | moe | | srcname | vauban | | srcname | wagner | | name | goaziou | call lines | call | dye | | call | dokos | | call | moe | | call | vauban | | call | wagner | | call | goaziou | data names | object | dye | | (data results) | wagner | | name | goaziou | It seems that srcname is pulling ahead for naming code blocks (to my surprise) and that call is the clear winner for call lines. labeling data is certainly less obvious and has tricky entanglements with other parts of Org-mode (e.g., tables will likely continue to be named with tblname). I'll likely be out of contact for the remainder of the weekend but when I'm back I'll update tallies and we can see where the consensus stands. Thanks to everyone who has or will reply, I think the best way to find the most natural options for these decisions is through surveys and it is great to have a community so willing to help. Cheers -- Eric -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/