From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Outline and org-mode don't insert text into folded sections logically Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 02:30:19 +0100 Message-ID: <871utqdmc4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1315077299.1785.YahooMailClassic@web121520.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <837h5nh1df.fsf@yahoo.it> <877h3xibb0.fsf@gnu.org> <81ehy5uy0t.fsf@gmail.com> <87wrbxdter.fsf@gnu.org> <877h3n7usn.fsf@gnu.org> <87hb2ru7qf.fsf@gnu.org> <87vcr7srij.fsf@gnu.org> <87k47ns2vx.fsf@gnu.org> <6CBBC924-DD81-46F0-B8ED-EC92D9B6A2AE@gmail.com> <87ehxuzw80.fsf@gnu.org> <87aa8eu34y.fsf@altern.org> <85DD63EE-538B-4ADC-A40A-1880FC040C59@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLm7R-00056F-SY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:29:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLm7Q-0008Pu-UT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:29:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:65482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLm7Q-0008Ot-QC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:29:24 -0400 Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so896095wwe.30 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:29:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85DD63EE-538B-4ADC-A40A-1880FC040C59@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:53:48 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Kelly Dean Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > OK, I will take a look at it and then push. Great, thanks! >> - From the docstring: "[...] or add in the middle or right after an >> invisible region" -- I agree inserting while in the middle of the >> invisible region would feel too unpredictable, but I'd argue that >> inserting *right after* the invisible region when point is at the end >> of it feels okay. Nevermind, maybe this request will come up later, >> I'm fine with your current solution. > > I tried, and it confused the hell out of me... :D When I did only try a few hours, so your UX is surely more stable than mine! :) Best, -- Bastien